(续上)正如它的浇奠须以圣洁,它的焚化也须以圣洁。从何推知这是指焚化?拉维纳 说:由浇奠所写的「圣」与剩余祭物所写的「圣」作字义类比推出:这里论浇奠写着「在圣所中,你要将浓酒浇奠」(民数记 28:7),那里论剩余之物写着「要把所剩下的用火焚烧,不可吃,因为是圣物」(出埃及记 29:34);由此推知剩下的浇奠也须焚化。
-
正如它的浇奠是以圣洁,同样,它的焚化也必须是以圣洁。
just as its pouring is in sanctity, so too must its burning be in sanctity.
-
从哪里可以推知这是指焚化?
From where may it be inferred that this is referring to burning?
-
拉维纳 说:这是借着一个字义类比推出的,就是论浇奠所写的「圣」这个词,与论剩余之祭物所写的「圣」这个词。
Ravina said: It is derived by means of a verbal analogy between the term sanctity written with regard to libations and sanctity written with regard to leftover offerings.
-
这里论浇奠写着:「在圣所中,你要将浓酒浇奠」(民数记 28:7);而那里论剩余的祭物写着:「要把所剩下的用火焚烧,不可吃,因为是圣物」(出埃及记 29:34)。
It is written here, with regard to libations: “In sanctity shall you pour a libation” (Numbers 28:7), and it is written there, with regard to leftover offerings: “You shall burn the leftovers in fire; they are not to be eaten, for they are sanctity” (Exodus 29:34).
-
借着这个字义类比,推出剩下的浇奠也必须被焚化。
Through the verbal analogy it is derived that leftover libations must also be burned.