一条 《巴拉伊塔》 说凡挪动别物的不洁之源都不使人不洁,惟独 漏症者 是全 妥拉 里独一无二的一例。这似与 拉比阿奇瓦 相违;答曰当读作「漏症者 与凡与它同类的」。
-
连没有生气的东西,也能这样挪动一个不洁之源。
Even an inanimate object can move a source of impurity in that way.
-
那食物与饮料若把秤压得偏了,它们仍是洁的。
And if the food and drink tipped the scales, they remain ritually pure.
-
革玛拉 问:一条 《巴拉伊塔》 里所教的,是合哪一位的意思呢?那里说:凡挪动别物的不洁之物,那别物都仍是洁的——就是说,东西被不洁之源挪动了并不因此成为不洁——惟独 漏症者 所挪动的是例外,这一层在全 妥拉 里再没有第二例。
The Gemara asks: In accordance with whose opinion is that which was taught in a baraita: All impure items that move other objects remain pure, meaning that an object does not become impure if moved by a source of impurity, except for movement by a zav, which has no counterpart in the whole Torah in its entirety?
-
我们且说:这话不合 拉比阿奇瓦 的意思;因为若合他的意思,拜偶像之物也当算在里头。
Let us say that this is not in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Akiva, as if it were in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Akiva, there is also the case of idolatry.
-
依他的意思,拜偶像之物挪动了别物,也把不洁传给它。
In his opinion, idolatry also transmits impurity to an object by moving it.
-
革玛拉 答:纵说这条 《巴拉伊塔》 合的是 拉比阿奇瓦 的意思也无妨,只须读作:漏症者 与凡与它同类的。
The Gemara answers: Even if you say that the baraita is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Akiva, teach: Zav and everything similar to it.
-
依 拉比阿奇瓦,经期的妇人既在这一类里,偶像也就在这一类里。
According to Rabbi Akiva, just as a menstruating woman falls into that category, so too does an idol.