两位坦拿所争的另有一层:大人的小肢体与婴孩的大肢体是否相当。末了引一条 《巴拉伊塔》,拉比西缅·本·以利亚撒 明说是才生一日的婴孩的小肢体。
-
拉比雅奈 门下的说法,是不取的。
and the opinion of the school of Rabbi Yannai is not accepted.
-
他们在这条 《巴拉伊塔》 里所争的,乃是这一层:拉比西缅·本·以利亚撒 以为大人的小肢体与才生一日的婴孩的大肢体两下相当;拉比拿单 以为搬出油够抹大人的小肢体的,才有责,至于才生一日的婴孩的大肢体那么点,便不然,是无责的。
And here, in this baraita, they disagree about this: Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar holds: A small limb of an adult and a large limb of a day-old child are equal to one another, and Rabbi Natan holds: For carrying out oil in a measure equivalent to that which is used to spread on a small limb of an adult, yes, one is liable; however, a large limb of a day-old child, no, he is exempt.
-
革玛拉 问:这一层末了断作怎样呢?
The Gemara asks: What conclusion was reached in this matter?
-
你来听一条为凭:一条 《巴拉伊塔》 里教说,拉比西缅·本·以利亚撒 明说:搬出油而有责的量,是够抹才生一日的婴孩的小肢体的分量。
Come and hear a proof, as it was taught in a baraita that Rabbi Shimon ben Elazar says explicitly: The measure that determines liability for carrying out oil is equivalent to that which is used to spread on a small limb of a day-old child.