——他的魂就上到荣耀宝座底下的本处,不再下来了。
-
——他的魂就上到荣耀宝座底下的本处,不再下来了。
and his soul ascends to its place beneath the Throne of Glory, and does not descend anymore.
← 安息日卷总目·第二十四章 天黑在路上的人
这不是译本,是辅读层。中文承载文本本身,并逐句标出哪些是塔木德自己的话、 哪些是 施泰因扎尔茨 补入的解释,以及哪些地方翻译必然有所流失。
谢法利亚 的 威廉·戴维森 版用 <b> 标出塔木德原文,其余为
施泰因扎尔茨 补入。下面的比例是逐句从这个标记算出来的,不是判断。
这一面每读 5 句,只有一句以塔木德自己的话为主。把这件事藏起来, 读者会以为自己读的是塔木德;标出来,他才知道自己站在哪里。
——他的魂就上到荣耀宝座底下的本处,不再下来了。
——他的魂就上到荣耀宝座底下的本处,不再下来了。
and his soul ascends to its place beneath the Throne of Glory, and does not descend anymore.
拉夫撒母耳·巴尔·舍拉之子 拉夫犹大 奉 拉夫 之名说:从人的哀辞上看得出他在来世有分没有分。听的人在哀辞中若心里疼痛、流下泪来,就见得那人是义人。革玛拉 问:果真如此么?拉夫 岂不是对 拉夫撒母耳·巴尔·舍拉 说:你在我的哀辞上要动众人的心,因为我要站在那里听你的话?连 拉夫 那样大的人尚且要嘱咐自己的哀辞。革玛拉 答:这不难。那说「在来世有分的可从哀辞认出来」的,说的是人要动听者的心、那心果然被动了;这一句说的是人要动听者的心、那心却不被动。那就见得死者不是义人。
拉夫撒母耳·巴尔·舍拉之子拉夫犹大 奉 拉夫 之名说:从人的哀辞上看得出他在来世有分没有分。
Rav Yehuda, son of Rav Shmuel bar Sheilat, said in the name of Rav: From a person’s eulogy it is apparent whether or not he has a share in the World-to-Come.
听的人在哀辞中若心里疼痛、流下泪来,就见得那人是义人。
If the listeners are pained and brought to tears during the eulogy, it is clear that the person was righteous.
革玛拉 问:果真如此么?
The Gemara asks: Is that so?
拉夫 岂不是对 拉夫撒母耳·巴尔·舍拉 说:你在我的哀辞上要动众人的心,因为我要站在那里听你的话?
Didn’t Rav say to Rav Shmuel bar Sheilat: Stir the hearts of those gathered during my eulogy, for I will be standing there and listening to your words?
连 拉夫 那样大的人,尚且要嘱咐自己的哀辞。
Even a person as great as Rav needed to give instructions about his eulogy.
革玛拉 答:这不难。那说「在来世有分的可从哀辞认出来」的,说的是人要动听者的心、那心果然被动了;这一句说的是人要动听者的心、那心却不被动。
The Gemara answers: This is not difficult, for this statement, which maintains that those who merit a share in the World-to-Come can be identified by their eulogies, is referring to a situation in which they attempt to stir the listener and he is stirred; while that statement is referring to a situation in which they attempt to stir the listener and he is not stirred.
那就见得死者不是义人。
That is an indication that the deceased person was not righteous.
阿巴耶 对 拉巴 说:论夫子、就是 拉巴 自己,蓬贝迪塔满城的人都恨你,谁在你的哀辞上心里被动呢?他对他说:只要你与 拉巴·巴尔·拉夫哈难 二人的心被动,于我就够了。
阿巴耶 对 拉巴 说:论夫子、就是 拉巴 自己,蓬贝迪塔 满城的人都恨你,谁在你的哀辞上心里被动呢?
Abaye said to Rabba: In the case of the Master, i.e., Rabba, whom all of the inhabitants of his city, Pumbedita, hate, who will be stirred during his eulogy?
他对他说:只要你与 拉巴·巴尔·拉夫哈难 二人的心被动,于我就够了。
He said to him: It is sufficient for me if you and Rabba bar Rav Ḥanan are stirred.
拉比以利亚撒 在 拉夫 面前提一疑:怎样的人在来世有分呢?他对他说:这可从这一句经推得:「你或向左或向右,你必听见后边有声音说:这是正路,要行在其间」(以赛亚书 30:21)。换句话说:人若在哀辞里说别人当效法他所行的路,他必在来世有分。拉比哈尼纳 说:凡我们的众夫子所喜悦的人,在来世有分。论「吊丧的在街上往来」(传道书 12:5)一句,加利利人说:你当行那你愿人在你棺前哀辞里所说的事。犹大人说:你当行那你愿人在你棺后哀辞里所说的事。革玛拉 说:他们并不相争,这一位是按自己那地方的常例说的,那一位是按自己那地方的常例说的——加利利的常例是哀哭的人站在棺前,犹大的常例是哀哭的人站在棺后。
拉比以利亚撒 在 拉夫 面前提一疑:怎样的人在来世有分呢?
Rabbi Elazar raised a dilemma before Rav: Which type of person has a share in the World-to-Come?
他对他说:这可从这一句经推得:「你或向左或向右,你必听见后边有声音说:这是正路,要行在其间」(以赛亚书 30:21)。
He said to him: We can derive this from the verse: “And your ears shall hear a word behind you, saying: This is the path, walk on it, when you turn to the right or to the left” (Isaiah 30:21).
换句话说:人若在哀辞里说别人当效法他所行的路,他必在来世有分。
In other words, if people eulogize one by saying that others should follow in his path, he must have a share in the World-to-Come.
拉比哈尼纳 说:凡我们的众夫子所喜悦的人,在来世有分。
Rabbi Ḥanina said: Anyone with whom our Rabbis are pleased has a share in the World-to-Come.
论「吊丧的在街上往来」(传道书 12:5)一句,加利利人说:你当行那你愿人在你棺前哀辞里所说的事。
In interpreting the verse: “And the eulogizers walk about the marketplace” (Ecclesiastes 12:5), the people of the Galilee say: Do things that you will want people to say at your eulogy in front of your bier.
犹大人说:你当行那你愿人在你棺后哀辞里所说的事。
The people of Judea say: Do things that you want people to say at your eulogy behind your bier.
革玛拉 说:他们并不相争;这一位是按自己那地方的常例说的,那一位是按自己那地方的常例说的。
The Gemara remarks: And they do not disagree; this Sage expressed it according to the norm in his place, and this Sage expressed it differently according to the norm in his place.
加利利的常例是哀哭的人站在棺前,犹大的常例是哀哭的人站在棺后。
The custom in the Galilee was that the eulogizers would stand before the bier and the custom in Judea was that eulogizers would stand behind the bier.
我们在别处一条密释纳里学过:拉比以利以谢 说,你当在死前一日悔改。他的门生问他说:人岂知道自己哪一日死呢?他对他们说:这样就更是好主意了——人当今日悔改,恐怕明日就死;照这话行的,就一生都在悔改之中了。所罗门王也凭他的智慧说:「你的衣服当时常洁白,你头上也不要缺少膏油」(传道书 9:8),意思是人当常常预备好。
我们在别处一条密释纳里学过:拉比以利以谢 说,你当在死前一日悔改。
We learned there in a mishna that Rabbi Eliezer says: Repent one day before your death.
他的门生问他说:人岂知道自己哪一日死呢?
Rabbi Eliezer’s students asked him: But does a person know the day on which he will die?
他对他们说:这样就更是好主意了——人当今日悔改,恐怕明日就死;照这话行的,就一生都在悔改之中了。
He said to them: All the more so this is a good piece of advice, and one should repent today lest he die tomorrow; and by following this advice one will spend his entire life in a state of repentance.
所罗门王也凭他的智慧说:「你的衣服当时常洁白,你头上也不要缺少膏油」(传道书 9:8),意思是人当常常预备好。
And King Solomon also said in his wisdom: “At all times your clothes should be white, and oil shall not be absent from upon your head” (Ecclesiastes 9:8), meaning that a person always needs to be prepared.
照样,拉班约哈难·本·撒该 讲了下面这个比方来说明这道理:这譬如有王请自己的臣仆赴筵,却没有定给他们时候。他们中间聪明的就妆饰整齐,坐在王宫门口,说:王家赴筵所需的,岂还缺什么么?王随时都可以召他们的。他们中间愚昧的却去作自己的工,说:哪有筵席不用工夫预备的呢?趁着筵席还在预备,我们且去办别的事。
照样,拉班约哈难·本·撒该 讲了下面这个比方来说明这道理:这譬如有王请自己的臣仆赴筵,却没有定给他们时候。
Similarly, Rabban Yoḥanan ben Zakkai said the following story as a parable to this lesson: The situation is comparable to a king who invited his servants to a feast and did not set a time for them to come.
他们中间聪明的就妆饰整齐,坐在王宫门口。
The wise among them adorned themselves and sat at the entrance to the king’s house.
他们说:王家赴筵所需的,岂还缺什么么?
They said: Is the king’s house missing anything necessary for the feast?
王随时都可以召他们的。
Certainly the king could invite them at any moment.
他们中间愚昧的却去作自己的工,说:哪有筵席不用工夫预备的呢?
The fools among them went to attend to their work and said: Is there such thing as a feast without the toil of preparing for it?
趁着筵席还在预备,我们且去办别的事。
While the feast is being prepared, we will attend to other matters.
忽然王吩咐臣仆来赴筵。他们中间聪明的穿着最好的衣裳、妆饰整齐进到他面前;愚昧的却带着一身脏进到他面前。王见了聪明的就欢喜,见了愚昧的就发怒。王说:这几个为赴筵妆饰整齐的聪明仆人,可以坐下吃喝;这几个不为赴筵妆饰的愚昧人,只可站着看。人若以为自己死与受审的日子还远、不预备自己,末了也是这样。
忽然王吩咐臣仆来赴筵。
Suddenly, the king requested that his servants come to the feast.
他们中间聪明的穿着最好的衣裳、妆饰整齐进到他面前;愚昧的却带着一身脏进到他面前。
The wise among them entered before him adorned in their finest clothes, and the fools entered before him dirty.
王见了聪明的就欢喜,见了愚昧的就发怒。
The king was happy to greet the wise ones and angry to greet the fools.
王说:这几个为赴筵妆饰整齐的聪明仆人,可以坐下吃喝;这几个不为赴筵妆饰的愚昧人,只可站着看。
The king said: These wise servants who adorned themselves for the feast shall sit and eat and drink, but these fools who did not adorn themselves for the feast shall stand and watch.
人若以为自己死与受审的日子还远、不预备自己,末了也是这样。
There is a similar outcome for people who think that their day of death and judgment is far away and do not prepare themselves for it.
拉比梅伊尔 的女婿奉 拉比梅伊尔 之名说:那不预先预备自己的,若单罚他站着看,还算不得重,因为那样他们看着也像筵上伺候的人,不算怎样羞辱。所以这些与那些、两下里都坐在筵上:这些聪明的义人吃,那些愚昧的恶人饿;这些义人喝,那些恶人渴,正如经上说:「所以主耶和华如此说:我的仆人必得吃,你们却饥饿;我的仆人必得喝,你们却干渴;我的仆人必欢喜,你们却蒙羞。我的仆人因心中高兴欢呼,你们却因心中忧愁哀哭」(以赛亚书 65:13–14)。
拉比梅伊尔 的女婿奉 拉比梅伊尔 之名说:那不预先预备自己的,若单罚他站着看,还算不得重,因为那样他们看着也像筵上伺候的人,不算怎样羞辱。
Rabbi Meir’s son-in-law said in the name of Rabbi Meir: If the punishment for those who did not prepare themselves in advance was merely to stand and watch, it would not be severe enough because they also look like servants at the feast, which is not such a disgraceful punishment.
所以这些与那些、两下里都坐在筵上。
Rather, these and these, both groups of people, sit at the feast.
这些聪明的义人吃,那些愚昧的恶人饿;这些义人喝,那些恶人渴,正如经上说:「所以主耶和华如此说:我的仆人必得吃,你们却饥饿;我的仆人必得喝,你们却干渴;我的仆人必欢喜,你们却蒙羞。
These wise and righteous people eat, and these wicked fools are hungry; these righteous people drink, and these wicked people are thirsty, as it is stated: “Therefore, thus said the Lord, God: Behold, My servants shall eat and you shall be hungry; behold, My servants shall drink and you shall be thirsty; behold, My servants shall rejoice and you shall be ashamed.
我的仆人因心中高兴欢呼,你们却因心中忧愁哀哭」(以赛亚书 65:13–14)。
Behold, My servants shall sing from a joyous heart and you shall scream from a pained heart” (Isaiah 65:13–14).
上头所引那一句,也可这样讲:「你的衣服当时常洁白」,指的是带 繸子 的衣裳,那繸子是白的。「你头上也不要缺少膏油」,这话暗指戴在头上的经匣。
上头所引那一句,也可这样讲:「你的衣服当时常洁白」,指的是带 繸子 的衣裳,那繸子是白的。
Alternatively, the verse quoted above can be interpreted in the following way: “At all times let your clothes be white”; this is clothing that contains ritual fringes [tzitzit], which are white.
「你头上也不要缺少膏油」,这话暗指戴在头上的经匣。
“And oil shall not be absent from upon your head”; these words hint to phylacteries, which are worn on the head.
章末语:「我们必再回到你这里,借用」——第二十三章(Sho'el)到此为止。本章自 148a.5 起,先立密释纳论安息日借物的措辞:可说「借用给我」,不可说「借贷给我」;妇人借饼也是一样;出借的信不过就可留外袍作押,逾越节前一日逢安息日办逾越羔羊的也照此办。随后是节期借贷告得告不得之争(拉夫约瑟 与 拉巴),并安息年消债、「我把这一笔放了」诸条;次论安息日可否把逾越羔羊分别为圣——同报一只羊、牧人预先分别、照价加圣三层解开。次立密释纳论数点客人与小食:只可凭记性,不可照单子念(一说怕抹去,一说怕接着念商契,分别在字写得高低、写在墙上还是牌上);席上与儿女家人拈阄之律,并「因己叫人受罚者不得入至圣者帐幕」一大段,牵出拿伯之灵、尼布甲尼撒与西底家、革希嫩里的战兢诸则。再立密释纳论安息日不可雇工、不可对人说叫他雇工、不可站在界边等天黑;由「不说自己的私话」推出「你自己的事不可讲,天上的事讲得」——为诫命算账、派定周济、办救命与公事、议婚配寻师傅都在许内。末了论守望棚、烂秸、新妇与死者之事、酒榨边念《分祷》,并 阿巴·扫罗「凡我讲得的事就可为它等天黑」那条通则的辨析,与安息日路上把钱袋交外邦人、放驴背上诸条收束。本卷二十四章,这是第二十三处。
密释纳:人在安息日前一日赶路、天黑了、安息日临到他还在路上的,可把自己的钱袋交给同行的外邦人。若没有外邦人同行,就把它放在驴背上。他到了城的外院、行李搁得稳当的地方,就把安息日可挪的器皿从驴背上取下来;至于安息日不可挪的器皿,他把系袋子的绳解开,那几袋器皿就自己落下来。
人在安息日前一日赶路、天黑了、安息日临到他还在路上的,可把自己的钱袋交给同行的外邦人。
One who was traveling on Shabbat eve and night fell, and Shabbat began while he was still en route, gives his money pouch to a gentile traveling with him.
若没有外邦人同行,就把它放在驴背上。
And if there is no gentile with him he places it on the donkey.
他到了城的外院、行李搁得稳当的地方,就把安息日可挪的器皿从驴背上取下来。
Once he reached the outer courtyard of the city, where belongings can be securely placed, he takes the vessels that may be moved on Shabbat off the donkey.
至于安息日不可挪的器皿,他把系袋子的绳解开,那几袋器皿就自己落下来。
With regard to the vessels that may not be moved on Shabbat, he unties the ropes that attach his bags to the donkey, and the bags of vessels fall on their own.
我们在密释纳里学过:人在安息日前一日赶路、天黑了、安息日临到他还在路上的,可把自己的钱袋交给外邦人。革玛拉 问:众贤何以许他把钱袋交给外邦人呢?犹太人叫外邦人在安息日作所禁之工,岂不是禁的么?革玛拉 答:众贤以为,人一遇要赔钱的事就按捺不住。你若不许他把钱袋交给外邦人,他就要在公共区里带过四肘去,那是犯了托拉的禁。
我们在密释纳里学过:人在安息日前一日赶路、天黑了、安息日临到他还在路上的,可把自己的钱袋交给外邦人。
We learned in the mishna: One who was traveling on Shabbat eve and night fell, and Shabbat began while he was still en route, gives his money pouch to a gentile.
革玛拉 问:众贤何以许他把钱袋交给外邦人呢?
The Gemara asks: What is the reason that the Sages permitted him to give his pouch to a gentile?
犹太人叫外邦人在安息日作所禁之工,岂不是禁的么?
Is it not prohibited for a Jew to ask a gentile to perform a prohibited labor on Shabbat?
革玛拉 答:众贤以为,人一遇要赔钱的事就按捺不住。
The Gemara answers: The Sages maintain that a person does not restrain himself when faced with losing his money.
你若不许他把钱袋交给外邦人,他就要在公共区里带过四肘去,那是犯了托拉的禁。
If you do not permit him to give his pouch to a gentile, he will come to carry four cubits in a public domain, thereby violating a Torah prohibition.
拉瓦 说:这一样许他交给外邦人的,单指他自己的钱袋;若是他捡着的失物,就不许。革玛拉 说:这是不必说的,因为我们在密释纳里学的正是「他自己的钱袋」,并没有别的。革玛拉 答:拉瓦 特特这样说,是免得你说失物也是一样、安息日也可交给外邦人,密释纳单说钱袋不过是因为事情多半这样发生;所以 拉瓦 告诉我们:那条密释纳所立的哈拉哈,确是单限于他自己的钱袋。革玛拉 又说:我们说失物不在这许可之内的,单指那物在安息日以先还没有到他手里;若那物在安息日以先已到他手里,它在律上就与他自己的钱袋一样。
拉瓦 说:这一样许他交给外邦人的,单指他自己的钱袋;若是他捡着的失物,就不许。
Rava said: This allowance to give the pouch to a gentile is specifically with regard to his own pouch, but in the case of a lost object that he found, no, it was not permitted.
革玛拉 说:这是不必说的,因为我们在密释纳里学的正是「他自己的钱袋」,并没有别的。
The Gemara asks: That is obvious, as we learned in the mishna: His pouch, and nothing else.
革玛拉 答:拉瓦 特特这样说,是免得你说失物也是一样、安息日也可交给外邦人,密释纳单说钱袋不过是因为事情多半这样发生。
The Gemara answers: Rava specified this lest you say that the same is true even with regard to a lost object, that one may give it to a gentile on Shabbat, and the mishna taught the case of his pouch merely because it is the manner in which the matter typically occurs.
所以 拉瓦 告诉我们:那条密释纳所立的 哈拉哈,确是单限于他自己的钱袋。
Therefore, Rava teaches us that the mishna is in fact establishing a halakha restricted to his pouch.
革玛拉 又说:我们说失物不在这许可之内的,单指那物在安息日以先还没有到他手里。
The Gemara comments: And we only said that this allowance does not apply to a lost object when it did not come into his possession before Shabbat.
若那物在安息日以先已到他手里,它在律上就与他自己的钱袋一样。
However, if the object already came into his possession before Shabbat, its legal status is like that of his pouch.
也有人把这一疑照别样传:拉瓦 提一疑说:失物在安息日以先已到他手里的,当怎样断呢?是当说:那物既已到他手里,在律上就与他自己的钱袋一样呢?还是当说:他既没有出力去得它,在律上就与他自己的钱袋不一样呢?他既没有费什么力,纵要赔了也按捺得住;那么众贤就不必许他交给外邦人了。革玛拉 末了说:这一疑存而不断。
也有人把这一疑照别样传。
Some state this dilemma in a different manner.
拉瓦 提一疑说:失物在安息日以先已到他手里的,这条 哈拉哈 当怎样断呢?
Rava raised a dilemma: With regard to a lost object that came into his possession before Shabbat, what is the ruling?
是当说:那物既已到他手里,在律上就与他自己的钱袋一样呢?
Is the halakha that since it already came into his possession, its legal status is like that of his pouch?
还是当说:他既没有出力去得它,在律上就与他自己的钱袋不一样呢?
Or perhaps, since he did not exert himself to acquire it, its legal status is not like that of his pouch.
他既没有费什么力,纵要赔了也按捺得住。
Since he expended no effort, he would be capable of restraining himself even when faced with losing it.
那么众贤就不必许他把它交给外邦人了。
Therefore, there is no need for the Sages to permit him to give it to a gentile.
革玛拉 末了说:这一疑存而不断。
The Gemara concludes: Let this dilemma stand unresolved.
我们在密释纳里学过:若没有外邦人同行,就把它放在驴背上。革玛拉 由此推说:所以这样,正因为没有外邦人同行;若有外邦人同行,他就交给外邦人,不放在驴背上。革玛拉 问:这条哈拉哈是什么缘故呢?革玛拉 答:论犹太人自己的驴,你是奉命顾念它安息日的安息的;论外邦人,你并不奉命顾念他的安息,也没有犯托拉的禁。
我们在密释纳里学过:若没有外邦人同行,就把它放在驴背上。
We learned in the mishna: And if there is no gentile with him he places it on the donkey.
革玛拉 由此推说:所以这样,正因为没有外邦人同行。
The Gemara infers: The reason is specifically because there is no gentile with him; if there is a gentile with him, he gives it to the gentile and does not place it on a donkey.
若有外邦人同行,他就交给外邦人,不放在驴背上。
The Gemara asks: What is the reason for this halakha?
革玛拉 问:这条 哈拉哈 是什么缘故呢?
The Gemara answers: With regard to a donkey belonging to a Jew, you are commanded with regard to its rest on Shabbat.
革玛拉 答:论犹太人自己的驴,你是奉命顾念它安息日的安息的;论外邦人,你并不奉命顾念他的安息,也没有犯托拉的禁。
With regard to a gentile, you are not commanded with regard to his rest and no Torah prohibition is being violated.
革玛拉 又教一条哈拉哈:他若没有外邦人同行,却有一头驴、一个聋哑人、一个痴愚人、一个未满十三岁的幼童,就把钱袋放在驴背上,不可交给那聋哑人、痴愚人或幼童。这是什么缘故呢?那三样人虽不担守诫命之责,究竟是人,这驴却不是人;宁可放在驴背上,胜过交给人。他若有聋哑人与痴愚人同行,就交给痴愚人。他若有痴愚人与幼童同行,就交给痴愚人。
革玛拉 又教一条 哈拉哈:他若没有外邦人同行,却有一头驴、一个聋哑人、一个痴愚人、一个未满十三岁的幼童,就把钱袋放在驴背上,不可交给那聋哑人、痴愚人或幼童。
The Gemara teaches an additional halakha: If there was no gentile with him but there was a donkey, a deaf-mute, an imbecile, and a minor, meaning someone under thirteen years old, one places it on the donkey, but one neither gives it to the deaf-mute, nor the imbecile, nor the minor.
这是什么缘故呢?
What is the reason for this?
那三样人虽不担守诫命之责,究竟是人,这驴却不是人。
Although they are not obligated to fulfill mitzvot, these are people, but this donkey is not a person.
宁可放在驴背上,胜过交给人。
It is preferable to place it on the donkey rather than give it to a person.
他若有聋哑人与痴愚人同行,就交给痴愚人。
And if a deaf-mute and an imbecile were with him, he gives it to the imbecile.
他若有痴愚人与幼童同行,就交给痴愚人。
If an imbecile and a minor were with him, he gives it to the imbecile.
众贤面前有一疑:他若有聋哑人与幼童同行,当怎样断呢?他把钱袋交给谁呢?革玛拉 答:依 拉比以利以谢 的意思你并无可疑,因为 拉比以利以谢 以为聋哑人在律上的心智胜过幼童,正如一条巴拉伊塔教说:拉比以撒 奉 拉比以利以谢 之名说:聋哑人从自己出产里分出来的举祭——
众贤面前有一疑:他若有聋哑人与幼童同行,当怎样断呢?
A dilemma was raised before the Sages: If a deaf-mute and a minor were with him, what is the ruling?
他把钱袋交给谁呢?
To whom does he give his pouch?
革玛拉 答:依 拉比以利以谢 的意思你并无可疑。
The Gemara answers: According to the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer you have no dilemma.
拉比以利以谢 以为聋哑人在律上的心智胜过幼童,正如一条 《巴拉伊塔》 教说:拉比以撒 奉 拉比以利以谢 之名说:聋哑人从自己出产里分出来的 举祭——
Rabbi Eliezer holds that a deaf-mute has a greater degree of halakhic intelligence than does a minor, as it was taught in a baraita: Rabbi Yitzḥak says in the name of Rabbi Eliezer: The teruma of a deaf-mute that he separated from his produce