续上:说可得益处的那位依据经文:「要把这羊担当他们一切的罪孽,带到割绝之地;他要把羊放在旷野」(利未记 16:22)——末句「在旷野」是多余的,指明那羊人人可用,如旷野一般。说禁止的那位也依据同一节,因经上写着「割绝」,指明禁止。
-
是依据一节经文立他的意见的,正如经上写着:「要把这羊担当他们一切的罪孽,带到割绝之地;他要把羊放在旷野」(利未记 16:22)。
established his opinion based on a verse, as it is written: “And the goat shall bear upon it all their iniquities to a land which is cut off; and he shall let go the goat in the wilderness” (Leviticus 16:22).
-
末句「在旷野」是不必要的,这就指明那羊是人人可用的,如同旷野一般。
The concluding phrase, “in the wilderness,” is unnecessary, and indicates that the goat shall be available for anyone to use, similar to a wilderness.
-
那说它们禁止的一位,也依据同一节经文立他的意见,因为经上写着「割绝」,这就指明禁止。
And the one who said they are prohibited based his opinion on the same verse, as it is written, “cut off” [gezeira], which indicates a prohibition.
「割绝」原文 gezeira,兼有「割断」与「谕令」之义,本段与下两段都系于这一字,中文接不住。