他耙那火炭的时候,若动了使祭作废的念头,那条 哈拉哈 当怎么断呢?这一念使那香作废么?革玛拉细说:这里所问的,是「为办一条诫命作预备的几样,算不算与那诫命本身一样」。若算一样,那么单是耙炭——那是为烧香作预备的——便如同烧香本身;既如此,一个不该动的念头就使那香作废。还是说:为办诫命作预备的几样,算不得那诫命本身的一分呢?这一问也没有答案,革玛拉又断道:此问悬而未决。
-
他耙那火炭的时候,若动了使祭作废的念头,那条 哈拉哈 当怎么断呢?
What is the halakha if he thought invalidating thoughts during the raking of the coals?
-
这一念使那香作废么?
Does this thought invalidate the incense?
-
革玛拉细说:这里所问的,是「为办一条诫命作预备的几样,算不算与那诫命本身一样」。
The Gemara elaborates: The question here is whether actions that facilitate the performance of a mitzva are considered like the mitzva itself.
-
若算一样,那么单是耙炭——那是为烧香作预备的——便如同烧香本身;既如此,一个不该动的念头就使那香作废。
If so, merely raking the coals, which facilitates the mitzva of the incense, is like burning the incense itself; therefore, an improper thought would disqualify the incense.
-
还是说:为办诫命作预备的几样,算不得那诫命本身的一分呢?
Or perhaps actions that facilitate the performance of a mitzva are not considered part of the mitzva itself.
-
这一问也没有答案,革玛拉又断道:此问悬而未决。
No answer was found for this question either, and the Gemara once again concludes: Let it stand unresolved.