他们所争的是:祭司未浸身就办礼事,那礼事算不算被亵渎而不合式。照 本·佐玛 说,这一次浸身所为的是圣,本是礼事的一分;既如此,祭司若不浸身,就亵渎了那礼事。照 拉比犹大 说,他并没有亵渎那礼事,因这一次浸身不过是防备之举。
-
他们所争的是:祭司未浸身就办礼事,那礼事算不算被亵渎而不合式。
It is with regard to whether the Temple service is desecrated and disqualified if the priest failed to immerse before its performance that they disagree.
-
照 本·佐玛 说,这一次浸身所为的是圣,本是礼事的一分;既如此,祭司若不浸身,就亵渎了那礼事。
According to the opinion of ben Zoma, this immersion is for the purpose of sanctification and is an integral part of the service; consequently, if the priest failed to immerse he desecrates the service.
-
照 拉比犹大 说,他并没有亵渎那礼事,因这一次浸身不过是防备之举。
According to the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda he does not desecrate the service, because the immersion is merely a precautionary measure.