← 盛日卷总目·第一章 七日
这不是译本，是辅读层。中文承载文本本身，并逐句标出哪些是塔木德自己的话、 哪些是 施泰因扎尔茨 补入的解释，以及哪些地方翻译必然有所流失。
谢法利亚 的 威廉·戴维森 版用 <b> 标出塔木德原文，其余为
施泰因扎尔茨 补入。下面的比例是逐句从这个标记算出来的，不是判断。
这一面没有一句以塔木德自己的话为主，全是补入的解释。标出来，读者才知道自己站在哪里。
既如此，岂不是非断定《《规格卷》》卷诸 《密释纳》 合 拉比以利以谢·本·雅各 的意思不可么？革玛拉断定说：正是如此，当这样断。
既如此，岂不是非断定《《规格卷》》卷诸 《密释纳》 合 拉比以利以谢·本·雅各 的意思不可么？
Rather, must one not conclude from it that that the mishnayot in tractate Middot are in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer ben Ya’akov?
革玛拉断定说：正是如此，当这样断。
The Gemara concludes: Indeed, conclude from it that this is so.
论羊房那一层相碍，拉夫阿达——拉夫以撒 的儿子——另出一解说：那一间房并不在角上，乃是在火房西面的当中，离角有些距离。所以从北边来的人看它像在那房的南边；从南边来的人看它像在那房的北边。
论羊房那一层相碍，拉夫阿达——拉夫以撒 的儿子——另出一解说：那一间房并不在角上，乃是在火房西面的当中，离角有些距离。
§ In an additional attempt to resolve the contradiction with regard to the Chamber of the Lambs, Rav Adda, son of Rav Yitzḥak, said: This chamber was removed from the corner, as it was not actually in the corner of the Hall of the Hearth but was located along the middle of the western side of the hall.
所以从北边来的人看它像在那房的南边；从南边来的人看它像在那房的北边。
And therefore, for one who comes from the north, the chamber appears to him to be in the south of the hall; and for one who comes from the south, the chamber appears to him to be in the north of the hall.
革玛拉说：无论怎样，照理那一间房离西南角比离西北角近些。这是从哪里推来的呢？是从我们所举的另一层相碍推来的：《《日常燔祭卷》》卷的密释纳里我们学过，预备陈设饼的房在东北角；《《规格卷》》卷的密释纳里我们却学过，预备陈设饼的房在东南角。
革玛拉说：无论怎样，照理那一间房离西南角比离西北角近些。
The Gemara comments: In any event, it is reasonable to say that this chamber was closer to the southwest corner than it was to the northwest corner.
这是从哪里推来的呢？
From where does one arrive at that conclusion?
是从我们所举的另一层相碍推来的：《《日常燔祭卷》》卷的密释纳里我们学过，预备陈设饼的房在东北角；《《规格卷》》卷的密释纳里我们却学过，预备陈设饼的房在东南角。
From the fact that we raise a contradiction between the mishna in tractate Tamid, where we learned that the chamber in which the shewbread was prepared stood in the northeast corner, and the mishna in tractate Middot, where we learned that the chamber in which the shewbread was prepared stood in the southeast corner.
而我们是照 拉夫胡纳——拉夫约书亚 的儿子——所说的解那一层相碍：《《规格卷》》卷那位夫子数那几房，是照人向右而行的次序，从南到东，再到北，再到西。《《日常燔祭卷》》卷那位夫子数那几房，是照人向左而行的次序，从南到西，再到北，再到东。两位论预备陈设饼那一房的所在其实相同，不过是从两样方位说罢了。
而我们是照 拉夫胡纳——拉夫约书亚 的儿子——所说的解那一层相碍：《《规格卷》》卷那位夫子数那几房，是照人向右而行的次序，从南到东，再到北，再到西。
And we resolve the contradiction based on what Rav Huna, son of Rav Yehoshua, said: The Master in tractate Middot envisions the chambers as one coming via the right, from the south to the east, then to the north and then to the west.
《《日常燔祭卷》》卷那位夫子数那几房，是照人向左而行的次序，从南到西，再到北，再到东。
And the Master in tractate Tamid envisions the chambers as one coming via the left, from the south to the west, then to the north and then to the east.
两位论预备陈设饼那一房的所在其实相同，不过是从两样方位说罢了。
Both agree with regard to the location of the chamber in which the shewbread was prepared; they merely describe that location from different perspectives.