其二,从这里断定:起头就推开的——就是那羊羔一分别为圣便已不合的——也算作永推。那母的既从来不曾合作逾越的羊羔用,人或要想它当献作平安祭;如今它连平安祭也不许献,正显明它是全然推开了的。(另见《住棚卷》33之间 一处相反的意思。)其三,从这里断定:所推开的不单是那祭牲自身,连那祭牲的银子也推开了,因卖它所得的价银是拿去买甘心祭、不是买平安祭的(拉比奴·哈纳内尔)。
And furthermore, conclude from this that deferral at the outset, when the lamb is first consecrated, is considered a permanent deferral; even though the female animal was never fit for use as a Paschal lamb and therefore one might have thought that it should be brought as a peace-offering, the fact that it may not be brought as a peace-offering indicates that it has been completely deferred. (See tractate Sukka 33b for an opposing view.) And conclude from this that there is deferral not only with regard to the offering itself, but also with regard to the money of that offering, as the proceeds from the sale of the offering are used for free-will offerings rather than peace-offerings (Rabbeinu Ḥananel).