密释纳说人在安息日不为逾越之羊羔的本名分而宰它,所论的究竟是怎样的光景呢?你若说所论的是他弄错了——真以为这一只是别样的祭、不是逾越之祭——那么从这祭不合式、他因此当献赎罪祭这一层,便可学出:误把一只祭牲的分位拔去,也算作拔去,虽然他本无意如此。(可这条密释纳若在这一层上表了态,倒是希奇的,因这一层我们在别处见得是众阿摩拉所争的〔托萨福〕。)不如说:这条密释纳断然是论那有意把这牲畜逾越之羊羔的分位拔去、当作别样的祭献上的人。
-
密释纳说人在安息日不为逾越之羊羔的本名分而宰它,所论的究竟是怎样的光景呢?
When the mishna speaks of one who slaughtered a Paschal lamb on Shabbat for a different purpose, with what precisely are we dealing?
-
你若说所论的是他弄错了——真以为这一只是别样的祭、不是逾越之祭——那么从这祭不合式、他因此当献赎罪祭这一层,便可学出:误把一只祭牲的分位拔去,也算作拔去,虽然他本无意如此。
If you say we are dealing with one who erred in that he actually thought this was a different offering and not a Paschal offering, learn from it, i.e., from the fact that the offering is disqualified and he is therefore liable to bring a sin-offering, that the erroneous uprooting of the status of an offering constitutes uprooting, even though he had no intention to do so.
-
可这条密释纳若在这一层上表了态,倒是希奇的,因这一层我们在别处见得是众阿摩拉所争的(托萨福)。
It would, however, be surprising to find the mishna taking a stand on this issue, as we find elsewhere that it is the subject of an amoraic dispute (Tosafot).
-
不如说:这条密释纳断然是论那有意把这牲畜逾越之羊羔的分位拔去、当作别样的祭献上的人。
Rather, the mishna must certainly be referring to one who intentionally uprooted the animal’s designation as a Paschal lamb and offered it as a different offering.