(接上面未完的一句)——这样办近乎在许食之界以外拿圣肉给犹太人吃,因它与逾越的羊羔相像,容易叫人误认。革玛拉细论这一句:整只烤的山羊羔,是禁的;不是整只烤的,便不禁——这与 拉夫 相违,因他连寻常的肉也禁人烤。众贤说,其分在此:整只烤的山羊羔,无论他说了「这是为逾越节的」没有,都是一样——两样光景里它都像一只祭牲,故是禁的。至于不是整只烤的:他若指明「这是为逾越节的」,便是禁的,因那看着像他把它分别为圣作祭;他若不曾指明,便不禁,因无可虑的。
-
——这样办近乎在许食之界以外拿圣肉给犹太人吃,因它与逾越的羊羔相像,容易叫人误认。
Doing so is akin to feeding Jews consecrated meat outside the permitted area, as due to its resemblance to the Paschal lamb it could be misleading.
-
革玛拉细论这一句:整只烤的山羊羔,是禁的;不是整只烤的,便不禁。
The Gemara analyzes this statement: A goat roasted whole, yes, it is prohibited; a goat not roasted whole, no, it is not prohibited.
-
这与 拉夫 相违,因他连寻常的肉也禁人烤。
This contradicts Rav, who prohibited roasting even ordinary meat.
-
众贤说,其分在此:整只烤的山羊羔,无论他说了「这是为逾越节的」没有,都是一样。
The Sages say that this is the distinction: With regard to a goat roasted whole, there is no difference if one said it is for Passover, and there is no difference if one did not say it is for Passover.
-
两样光景里,它都像一只祭牲,故是禁的。
In either case, it looks like a sacrifice and it is prohibited.
-
至于不是整只烤的:他若指明「这是为逾越节的」,便是禁的,因那看着像他把它分别为圣作祭。
With regard to a goat not roasted whole, if one specified that it is for Passover, yes, it is prohibited because it appears that he is consecrating it as a sacrifice.
-
可他若不曾指明是为逾越节的,便不禁,因并无可虑的。
However, if one did not specify that it is for Passover, no, it is not prohibited, as there is no need for concern.