众贤又立一通则:人不可违了当地的风俗,免得起争端。照样,人把安息年的出产从田间那一样已绝的地方带到还没绝的地方,或从还没绝的地方带到已绝的地方,都当照两处的严处把那出产从手里除去。(安息年的出产,惟有那一样果子还在田间作无主之物的时候,家家才可以在屋里吃它;那一样果子田间既已没有、兽也吃不着了,人便当把家里所剩的那一样除去。密释纳所说的,正是人把果子从田间已绝之地带到未绝之地,或反过来的光景。)拉比犹大 说:他不必除去,因他可以对当地人说:你也出去,从那还有这果子的地方带些来就是了。
-
众贤又立一通则:人不可违了当地的风俗,免得起争端。
The Sages stated a principle: And a person may not deviate from the local custom, due to potential dispute.
-
照样,人把安息年的出产从田间那一样已绝的地方带到还没绝的地方,或从还没绝的地方带到已绝的地方,都当照两处的严处,把那出产从自己手里除去。
Similarly, one who transports Sabbatical Year produce from a place where a crop has ceased in the fields to a place where it has not yet ceased or from a place where it has not yet ceased to a place where it has already ceased is obligated to remove the produce from his possession, in accordance with the stringencies of both locations.
-
安息年的出产,惟有那一样果子还在田间作无主之物的时候,家家才可以在屋里吃它。
It is permitted for homeowners to eat Sabbatical Year produce in their houses only as long as that species of fruit remains in the field as ownerless property.
-
可那一样果子田间既已没有、连兽也吃不着了,人便当把家里所剩的那一样除去。
However, once that particular fruit is no longer available for animals in the fields, one is required to remove what remains of that species from his home.
-
密释纳所说的,正是人把果子从田间已绝之地带到未绝之地,或是反过来的光景。
The statement in the mishna is referring to one who transported fruit from a location where it ceased in the fields to one where it did not, and vice versa.
-
拉比犹大 说:他不必除去,因他可以对当地人说:你也出去,从那还有这果子的地方带些来就是了。
Rabbi Yehuda says that he need not remove the produce, as he can say to a local resident: You, too, go out and bring this produce from a place where it remains in the field.