这就与 乌拉 的行法难通了——他念 《分祷》 那一祝,以「当称颂的」起头,却不以「当称颂的」收尾。革玛拉答:乌拉 尽可对你说:这一祝也算作为行诫命所念的一样,所以不必另有一句收尾。革玛拉把这一答讲明:为行诫命所念的祝谢何以不必另有一句收尾呢?因为行诫命所念的原是一句颂赞;它里头既没有别样与颂赞无干的话,譬如求告或恳求,就不必另添一句收尾的祝谢。 《分祷》 这一祝也一样,通篇都是颂赞。
-
这就与 乌拉 的行法难通了——他念 《分祷》 那一祝,以「当称颂的」起头,却不以「当称颂的」收尾。
This is difficult for the opinion of Ulla, who began but did not conclude the blessing of havdala with: Blessed.
-
革玛拉答:乌拉 尽可对你说:这一祝也算作为行诫命所念的一样,所以不必另有一句收尾。
The Gemara answers: Ulla could have said to you: This blessing is also considered like a blessing over mitzvot, and therefore it does not require a separate conclusion.
-
革玛拉把这一答讲明:为行诫命所念的祝谢何以不必另有一句收尾呢?
The Gemara clarifies this response: What is the reason that blessings over mitzvot do not require a distinctive conclusion?
-
因为行诫命所念的原是一句颂赞;它里头既没有别样与颂赞无干的话,譬如求告或恳求,就不必另添一句收尾的祝谢。
It is because a blessing over a mitzva is a statement of praise, and as it does not include anything unrelated to the praise, e.g., a request or supplication, it is unnecessary to add a separate concluding blessing.
-
《分祷》 这一祝也一样,通篇都是颂赞。
This havdala blessing also is comprised only of praise.