你若愿意,也可以说:众人都同意行一条诫命并不须存着心意;他们这里所争的,乃是犯「不可在 妥拉 的诸诫命上有所增添」这一条须有什么。因头一位 坦拿 执定:犯「不可增添」这一条并不须存着心意。人另戴一副经匣,纵不存着成全那诫命之意,也算犯了「不可在诸诫命上增添」。拉班迦玛列 却执定:要犯「不可在诸诫命上增添」这一条,须存着行一条诫命之意。这一样里他的心意不过是要把经匣挪到稳妥之处,所以他可以再戴一副。
-
你若愿意,也可以说:众人都同意行一条诫命并不须存着心意;他们这里所争的,乃是犯「不可在 妥拉 的诸诫命上有所增添」这一条须有什么。
And if you wish, say instead that everyone agrees that to fulfill a mitzva one does not need intent, and here they disagree with regard to the condition needed to violate the prohibition: Do not add to mitzvot of the Torah.
-
因头一位 坦拿 执定:犯「不可增添」这一条并不须存着心意。
As the first tanna holds that one does not need intent to violate the prohibition: Do not add to mitzvot.
-
人另戴一副经匣,纵不存着成全那诫命之意,也算犯了「不可在诸诫命上增添」。
One who dons another pair of phylacteries transgresses the prohibition against adding to mitzvot even if he does not don them with the intention of fulfilling the mitzva.
-
拉班迦玛列 却执定:要犯「不可在诸诫命上增添」这一条,须存着行一条诫命之意。
And Rabban Gamliel holds that in order to violate the prohibition: Do not add to mitzvot, one needs intent to perform a mitzva.
-
这一样里他的心意不过是要把经匣挪到稳妥之处,所以他可以再戴一副。
Since in this case one’s intention is merely to move the phylacteries to a safer place, he may don a second pair.