我们起初所想的,是 拉夫 与 撒母耳 在「巷里住户与院里住户合过界」与「没有合过界」两样上都相争;那就得讲明:合过界的那一样,他们所争的是哪一层?没有合过界的那一样,所争的又是哪一层?就是说,这两样情形里,所争的关节各在哪里?
-
我们起初所想的,是 拉夫 与 撒母耳 在「巷里住户与院里住户立过 合界」与「没有立过 合界」两样情形上都相争;那就得讲明了。
And with regard to what first entered our minds, that Rav and Shmuel disagree both in the case where the residents of the alleyway and the residents of the yard established an eiruv together, as well as in the case where they did not establish an eiruv together, explanation is necessary.
-
革玛拉 要讲明:立过 合界 的那一样,他们所争的是哪一层;没有立过 合界 的那一样,所争的又是哪一层。
The Gemara seeks to explicate on what point they disagree in the case where they established a joint eiruv, and on what point they disagree in the case where they did not establish a joint eiruv.
-
就是说,这两样情形里,所争的关节各在哪里呢?
That is to say, what is the crux of the argument in these two cases?