只是我们在别处一段密释纳里岂不是学过:人前一日忘了与同院的人立 合界,就把自己在院里的分舍给同院别的居民;随后他又把东西从自家搬到院里——不拘是无心还是有意——他就重新拦住全院的居民不可搬;这是 拉比梅伊尔 的说法。这就含着说,照 拉比梅伊尔 的意思,那居民纵在安息日当日把东西搬到院里,也把所舍的作废了;这与 拉比梅伊尔 自己在密释纳里论 撒都该人 所说的相反。
-
只是我们在别处一段密释纳里岂不是学过:人前一日忘了与同院的人立 合界,就把自己在院里的分舍给同院别的居民;随后他又把东西从自家搬到院里——不拘是无心还是有意——他就重新拦住全院的居民不可搬;这是 拉比梅伊尔 的说法。
But didn’t we learn elsewhere in the mishna: If one gave away his rights in his courtyard to the other residents of the courtyard, renouncing them after having forgotten to establish an eiruv with them the previous day, and then he carried something out from his house into the courtyard, whether unwittingly or intentionally, he again renders it prohibited for all the residents of the courtyard to carry; this is the statement of Rabbi Meir.
-
这就含着说,照 拉比梅伊尔 的意思,那居民纵在安息日当日把东西搬到院里,也把所舍的作废了;这与 拉比梅伊尔 自己在密释纳里论 撒都该人 所说的相反。
This indicates that according to Rabbi Meir, even if the resident carried something into the courtyard on Shabbat itself, he cancels his renunciation, contrary to Rabbi Meir’s own statement in the mishna with regard to a Sadducee.