拉夫帕帕 就 拉比约书亚·本·利未 何以两句都说,另讲一解:拉比约书亚·本·利未 必得告诉我们 哈拉哈 依 拉比约哈难·本·努里 的说法;他若单说论到 合界 依从宽的那一说,你心里或者要想:这话单用在院子的 合界 上,那全是拉比所立的。至于安息日之界的 合界、律例较严的那一样,你就要说我们不该从宽了,所以两句都少不得。
-
拉夫帕帕 就 拉比约书亚·本·利未 何以两句都说,另讲一解:拉比约书亚·本·利未 必得告诉我们 哈拉哈 依 拉比约哈难·本·努里 的说法;他若单说论到 合界 依从宽的那一说,你心里或者要想:这话单用在院子的 合界 上,那全是拉比所立的。
Rav Pappa said a different explanation for the fact that Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi made both statements: It was necessary for Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi to inform us that the halakha is in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Yoḥanan ben Nuri, because had he said only that the halakha follows the lenient opinion with regard to an eiruv, it could have entered your mind to say that this statement applies only with regard to the laws governing the eiruv of courtyards, which are entirely rabbinic in origin.
-
至于安息日之界的 合界、律例较严的那一样,你就要说我们不该从宽了,所以两句都少不得。
But with regard to the more stringent laws governing the eiruv of Shabbat limits, you would have said that we should not rule leniently, and therefore it was necessary to make both statements.