只是论人的这一断与论人的那一断,就难了:一条 《巴拉伊塔》 说人不可拿人作 棚 的墙,另一条却说可以拿人作墙、并且明说他这样作是「好使自己在 棚 里吃、喝、睡」。那就含着说:所缺的纵是第三面墙,这样办也是许的。
-
只是论人的这一断与论人的那一断,就难了:一条 《巴拉伊塔》 说人不可拿人作 棚 的墙,另一条却说可以拿人作墙、并且明说他这样作是「好使自己在 棚 里吃、喝、睡」。
However, with regard to the contradiction between the one ruling concerning a person and the other ruling concerning a person, it is difficult, for one baraita states that one may not use a person as the wall of a sukka, while the other says that one may use a person as a wall and even states explicitly that he may do this: So that he may eat, drink and sleep in the sukka.
-
那就含着说:所缺的纵是第三面墙,这样办也是许的。
That implies that this is permitted even if it is the third wall that is missing.