——还是所断的 哈拉哈 不依 拉班迦玛列 的意思呢?或者我们所议的是那样一件:尼希米与安息日之界之间那一段,站不满那些立过 合界、因而许为他立人墙的人。那样情形,人数只够从尼希米所站之处一直排到离那界两肘之处;而 拉夫希斯达 所提的一疑就是:所断的 哈拉哈 依 拉比以利以谢 的意思么?那一位说,人出了安息日之界两肘的仍可回来;还是所断的 哈拉哈 不依 拉比以利以谢 的意思呢?
-
——还是所断的 哈拉哈 不依 拉班迦玛列 的意思呢?
or is the halakha not in accordance with the opinion of Rabban Gamliel?
-
或者我们所议的是那样一件:尼希米与安息日之界之间那一段,站不满那些立过 合界、因而许为他立人墙的人。
Or perhaps we are dealing with a case where the space between Neḥemya and the Shabbat limit could not be filled with people who had established an eiruv and were permitted to establish a human partition for Neḥemya.
-
那样情形,人数只够从尼希米所站之处一直排到离那界两肘之处;而 拉夫希斯达 所提的一疑就是:所断的 哈拉哈 依 拉比以利以谢 的意思么?那一位说,人出了安息日之界两肘的仍可回来;还是所断的 哈拉哈 不依 拉比以利以谢 的意思呢?
In that case, there were enough people to establish partitions from where Neḥemya was standing to within two cubits from the limit, and the dilemma that Rav Ḥisda raised was: Is the halakha in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer, who says that someone who went two cubits outside of his Shabbat limit may reenter it, or is the halakha not in accordance with the opinion of Rabbi Eliezer?