人何必真把那 合界 带到他所要立为居处的地方去呢?我们何不说:他若愿意带去本是带得去的,那么他虽没有带去,也算作他已经带去了。这正合 拉比耶利米 论篮子所说的那一路:因为人可以把它一斜。这里既不用那一路来说,可见「本可以作」还不够,非实在作了不可。
-
人何必真把那 合界 带到他所要立为居处的地方去呢?
Why must one actually bring the eiruv to the place where he wishes to establish his residence?
-
我们何不说:他若愿意带去本是带得去的,那么他虽没有带去,也算作他已经带去了。
Let us say: Since if he wished to bring the eiruv there he could bring it, even though he did not bring it, it is considered as though he did bring it there.
-
这正合 拉比耶利米 论篮子所说的那一路:因为人可以把它一斜。
This follows the same reasoning proposed by Rav Yirmeya in the case of the basket: Since one can tilt it.
-
这里既不用那一路来说,可见「本可以作」还不够,非实在作了不可。
The fact that this reasoning is not employed here indicates that the potential to do something is insufficient; rather, the deed must actually be done.