拉瓦 引密释纳自证:其余液体既以四分之一 罗格 为量,兑好的一杯酒也当以此为量;他一贯说不能以一分酒兑三分水的便不算酒。
-
也在密释纳里学过这一层:人搬出没有兑水的酒,须有兑一杯酒所用的分量,才算有责。
learned that in the mishna: One who carries out undiluted wine is only liable if he carries out a measure equivalent to the wine typically diluted for a cup.
-
又有就这条密释纳所教的:是兑成一杯像样的酒所需的分量。
And it was taught with regard to the mishna: A measure equivalent to the wine diluted for a significant cup of wine.
-
密释纳后半又教说:搬出其余各样液体而有责的量,是四分之一 罗格。
And it was taught in the latter clause of the mishna: And the measure that determines liability for carrying out all other liquids is a quarter of a log.
-
既然四分之一 罗格 是液体的要紧之量,兑好的酒也当以此为要紧之量。
Since a quarter of a log is the significant measure for liquids, that is also the significant measure for diluted wine.
-
拉瓦 这话与他一贯的道理相合,因为 拉瓦 说过:凡不能以一分酒兑三分水的,就不算酒。
And Rava is consistent with his line of reasoning, as Rava said: Any wine that does not hold one part wine diluted by three parts water is not wine.
-
酒须够浓,才经得起兑上三倍于己的水。
Wine must be sufficiently potent to be capable of being diluted with water three times its measure.