——那么「凡我讲得的事,我就可为它站在界边等天黑」这一句就说得不合式了。密释纳倒该照反面立这通则说:凡我安息日讲不得的事,我就不可为它站在界边等天黑,正合密释纳起头的语式。所以那话必是就密释纳的后一半说的——那里教说:只是他可为看守自己的出产而站在界边等天黑,随后手里带些出产回来。只是纵这样讲,那语式也不合式:倒该反过来说「凡我可为它站在界边等天黑的事,我就讲得」。
-
——那么「凡我讲得的事,我就可为它站在界边等天黑」这一句就说得不合式了。
this phrase: Anything that I am permitted to discuss on Shabbat I am permitted to wait for nightfall for its sake, is not appropriate.
-
密释纳倒该照反面立这通则说:凡我安息日讲不得的事,我就不可为它站在界边等天黑,正合密释纳起头的语式。
Rather, the mishna should have formulated the principle in the negative: With regard to anything that I am not permitted to discuss on Shabbat, I am not permitted to wait for nightfall for its sake, similar to the phraseology at the beginning of the mishna.
-
所以那话必是就密释纳的后一半说的——那里教说:只是他可为看守自己的出产而站在界边等天黑,随后手里带些出产回来。
Rather, it is referring to the latter clause of the mishna, which taught: But he may wait for nightfall in order to guard his produce, and he may bring produce in his hand.
-
只是纵这样讲,那语式也不合式。
But even if this is correct, the phraseology does not fit.
-
倒该反过来说:凡我可为它站在界边等天黑的事,我就讲得。
It should have said the opposite: Anything for which I am permitted to wait for nightfall I am permitted to discuss.