(续上)只有晒干途中的干无花果与葡萄干例外——这些果子本可鲜吃,却被特意拿开、让它们晒干,其间不能吃,所以在这段时间被主动从人心里除去。未熟的枣子不能鲜吃,熟了才能吃;人把它放进篮里催熟,从未全然离开他的心思——它并非由能吃变为不能吃——所以许可。若是这样,野放的牲畜同样从未全然离开人的心思,也不该算 禁动之物;那 拉比犹大·哈纳西 为何表示它们有 禁动之物 的地位?
-
……只有晾干途中的干无花果与葡萄干这一种情形例外。
except for the case of dried figs and raisins in the midst of the drying process alone.
-
这些是本适合鲜吃的果子,却被特意从使用中拿开,好让它们经历晾干的过程,其间它们是不能吃的;所以在这段时间里,它们被主动从人的心思里除去了。
These are fruits that are fit to be eaten fresh and were deliberately removed from use to allow them to undergo a drying process, during which time they are inedible; they have therefore been actively removed from one’s mind for the interim.
-
然而未熟的枣子不适合鲜吃,只有熟了才变得可以吃。
Unripe dates, however, are unfit to be eaten fresh and become fit for eating only when they are ripe.
-
因此,人若把未熟的枣子放进一个篮子里让它们熟,它们从未完全离开他的心思,因为并没有从能吃的状态变为不能吃的状态,所以是许可的。
Therefore, if one places unripe dates in a basket to ripen, they are never completely removed from his mind, not having been changed from an edible state to an inedible state, and are permitted.
-
若是这样,野放的牲畜同样从未完全离开人的心思,也就不应当被看作 禁动之物。
If so, desert animals, which are similarly never completely removed from one’s mind, should also not be considered muktze.
-
那么,拉比犹大·哈纳西 为什么表示它们有 禁动之物 的地位呢?
Why, then, does Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi indicate that they have the status of muktze?